Laura's_persuasive_article

 =Discover the truth about the scrofulous, hypocritical and self-destructive Vegetarianism = By Laura Hernando

God has permitted us to be omnivores for over two millenniums, and has designed our bodies in a way which makes us capable of doing so. Then, why become a vegetarian? Why challenge how we have survived? Through the ingestion of meat our specie has grown strong and intelligent. Therefore, there are no motives to radically change our diet, nor ethical, nor health reasons. Vegetarianism has been veiled under arguments of animal rights and wellbeing. But the truth is that there are no honest facts that can prove that those misleaders are right.

The aim of all of us is to maintain a healthy lifestyle, and to obtain this, it is important to have a balanced diet. Consequently, there is no need to take harmful and extreme measures such as reducing the amount of meat to zero. The fact that some people eat more meat than is healthful doesn't mean that the best option is to not eat any meat. Why not simply eat less? Our bodies weren't made to eat only plants, if they were, we would have multiple stomachs like cows. Instead, our stomach's produce hydrochloric acid, which is not found in herbivores. I admit that some farms treat animals with unnecessary cruelty. Yet, this isn't sufficient to generalize that all farms do. It is more coherent to only eat or use animal products that you are sure have been obtained without causing animal suffering. In the same way as for health, the most logical is to consider less extreme measures.

Being a Vegetarian is entirely unnatural. For how many animals eat other animals? A lot of them, and we don't consider it cruel for a lion to eat a zebra, it is simply the circle of life. One animal eats another. We humans are animals, the only difference between us and a lion for example is that we have evolved further and have a higher capacity of intellect. But it is natural for us to eat other animals, so it shouldn't be considered wrong a human to eat a chicken, a pig, a cow or any other animal. Consider one of the vegetarian’s strongest argument, that the grain used to feed a cow, pig or any other animal could be used to feed hungry people. The problem with this argument is that it is entirely incorrect, for those people aren’t starving because there isn’t enough food in the world. They are starving because they are not given access to the food that there already is. If we had more food, would we actually get the food to them? No. More food does not mean less hungry people. We should concentrate on giving starving people access to the food that there is, before taking drastic measures which could affect many more people than those starving.

Some Vegetarian's may tell you that you can make a difference, that you can // save // animals. However, this isn't true. The meat market has grown to a point in which it is far too large to be able to notice a single person's consumption. This means that you if you were to stop eating meat, not only would you not have any effect on the number of animals killed, but the food that you would normally consume, would be left and wasted, and you would have therefore made an animal die for no purpose.

Ironically, some of the vegetarians that insult us for eating animals, also cause animal's death by using animal products such as glue, gelatine and some pharmaceutical capsules. They use these products despite claming to protect their rights; they are unquestionably hypocritical and have as a result no right to judge our omnivore behaviour.

You know the facts, now it's up to you. If you don't care about the health benefits of not being a vegetarian, about the circle of life, about how hypocritical they are, about their disrespect towards The Lord's will and all the other reasons for being an omnivore which I have given you in this article, then become a vegetarian. If not, If you do care, then yourself and all other omnivores, including myself, will be proud of your wise conclusion for you have chosen the right thing to do.   